Ego-depletion is the experience
we have when we engage in a series of demanding choices and decisions. When we have to force ourselves to do or
decide something, we have fewer cognitive and emotional resources available for
the next choice or decision. The series
of difficult mental and emotional tasks drains our personal reserve bit by
bit. This is called “ego-depletion.” Ego-depleted people are more likely to quit
in the midst of difficult task and more likely to succumb to loss of
self-control.
- “…if you have to force yourself to do something you are less willing or less able to exert self-control when the next challenge comes around…ego-depleted people therefore succumb more quickly to the urge to quit” (Kahneman, pages 41-42).
- “Unlike cognitive load, ego depletion is at least in part a loss of motivation. After exerting self-control on one task, you do not feel like making an effort in another, although you could do it if you really had to” (Kahneman, page 42).
Experiments by Roy Baumeister and
colleagues have indicated a relationship between sugar-intake and
ego-depletion. The efforts involved in
dealing with conflict and self-control are very glucose-intensive. Neurons are eating sugar at very high rates
during such activities. If there isn’t
enough sugar for the busy little nerve cells, their work slows and I feel
ego-depleted. I lose motivation and
hope. I become anxious and crabby. I am less able to resist my impulses and more
willing to give in to various temptations.
These realities have a simple implication for conflict in the church.
I have participated in numerous
congregational meetings that were scheduled prior to a meal—either lunch or
dinner. The logic in such scheduling is that
people who are hungry will be motivated to move through the meeting with a
minimum of fuss and bother. After all,
they want to get to the important business—the food! Baumeister’s research would indicate that
this is an inaccurate, unhelpful and even dangerous strategy.
Imagine that you have a bunch of
church members at such a meeting. Lunch
is waiting. Some of them didn’t get a
very good breakfast in their hurry to get to worship, followed by a
meeting. They are hungry—or at least glucose-deficient. What are some of the possible outcomes based on
the research?
- They will be more likely to make intuitive errors of judgment than people with enough glucose. So they will be more likely to draw conclusions that are quick, easy and wrong.
- They will be more likely to see problems as intractable, the future as bleak and the outcome of a problem as hopeless.
- They will have less motivation at the beginning of the meeting, and that motivation level will rapidly decrease with each problem confronted or decision made.
- They will have less self-control and will be more likely to say things to one another that they would keep to themselves in a better-fed condition. The potential for people to feel insulted by one another increases.
- They will rely on default positions and judgments and be less able to engage in creative thinking and decisions with some measure of risk.
“We find that the
percentage of favorable rulings drops gradually from 65% to nearly zero within
each decision session and returns abruptly to 65% after a break. Our findings suggest that judicial rulings
can be swayed by extraneous variables that should have no bearing on legal
decisions.”
Kahneman delivers the “verdict.” He writes, “The best possible account of the
data provides the bad news: tired and hungry judges tend to fall back on the
easier default position of denying requests for parole. Both fatigue and hunger probably played a
role.” (Kahneman, 2011, p. 43)
If that is the case for
highly-trained, broadly experienced judges within a practice rooted in rational
decision-making, what does that mean for a bunch of sugar-deprived folks
deciding whether to borrow a million bucks for a building or to ask a troubled
pastor to leave without another call? So
the practice of scheduling meetings prior to meals may be part of a formula for
creating conflict. It would be wise to
offer some healthy snacks prior to or even during the meeting. Fruit and nuts at the tables of a meeting
could go a long way to avoiding “fruit and nuts” outcomes at the meeting!
This insight also applies to personal situations. When we are grieving, for example, we are carrying a huge cognitive and emotional load. I have to spend much more time monitoring my energy levels than I did in my former life. I make sure that I have a small snack with me most of the time.
Candy makers understand this as well. Just re-watch one of those Snickers commercials that portrays the sugar-starved actor as a difficult person until the candy treatment is applied.
That explains 60 council meetings over a period of 5 years when the meeting time was 6:30 p.m. and we all were waiting till the meeting got done at 9 to go home and eat.
ReplyDelete